Environmental Stewardship Commission

Episcopal Church in Minnesota

Upcoming Activities:

Next Meeting:

Friday-Saturday, March 31-April 1, 2006 at St. Andrew's by-the-Lake Confessor Episcopal Church, Duluth, MN

Special Project for 2006:

Mary Brown Environmental Center in Ely, MN Details now available.


Resolution on the Spirituality of Food Production

Resolution on Church Buildings and Grounds

Resolution on Creation Season

Resolution on Green Congregations

On our Website:

Environmental Events:
Special Project for 2005:

Lectionary Reflection

For Land Sunday

Year A, Proper 19

The reflections on this page are part of a request from David Rhoads, Professor of New Testament, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, for MEESC members to offer ecological sermon notes for the alternative lectionary lessons for Creation Season Sundays in 2005 for use by pastors. This is the second of the selected Sundays, September 11, 2005, which corresponds in the Lectionary used by the Episcopal Church as Proper 19.

In the "alternative lectionary lessons" of the Revised Common Lectionary, the readings are from the following: Exodus 14:19-31; Psalm 114 or Exodus 15:1b-11,20-21; Romans 14:1-12; and Matthew 18:21-35 OR Genesis 50:15-21; Psalm 103:(1-7), 8-13; Romans 14:1-12; and Matthew 18:21-35

Psalm excerpt for today (Psalm 96, vs 12)

let the field exult, and everything in it.

Thoughts for "Land Sunday" by the Rev Dcn Helen Hanten

"This Land is your Land, this Land is my Land (from California to the New York islands.)..." .

In cultural terms, "land" may be a country, and "homeland" a place where one has a deep sense of belonging. Many countries' names describe their setting: Iceland, Greenland, Newfoundland.... Other place names are the land of a people: Scotland, Thailand, Finland.... Political boundaries define these lands.

In physical terms, land is the part of the earth differentiated from the oceans. In creation, God separated the water from the dry land, and the land is certainly the portion where most humans and higher animals make their home and find their food. Varying formations of the land add diverse images to what we think of as landscape: farmland, wetland, wasteland....

In spiritual terms, The Holy Land is the country where Jesus lived, where the Gospel stories are set. It is sacred, as well, to Jews as the setting for most of the history of the Hebrew people, and to Muslims in their history. Many Christian pilgrims have felt a deep sense of awe walking in places where Jesus walked, seeing sights he would have seen, praying in the garden of Gethsemene as Jesus did. It is Holy Land, indeed!

Shrines and memorial sites all over the world attest to the human inclination to remember significant people and events by marking the place of a happening, and calling the place sacred. We may treat our church yards as sacred space, and most particularly our cemeteries, where our families are buried. Ancestral burial grounds are deemed sacred for generations in some cultures, and have led to protests of future development for other use.

About ten years ago the Minnesota Episcopal Environmental Stewardship Commission considered submitting a resolution to its diocesan convention, asking that Episcopalians in Minnesota consider the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota be considered sacred land. Sacred in the sense that it is preserved as wilderness, keeping it as nearly as possible the way God created it. Letting wildness be. Letting natural succession occur. The discussion within the group led to deeper thinking about sacred ground and sacred places. And the question arises: is the place different because we name it so? What is "holy ground"? Or is it all holy, all sacred because it is part of God's gift of creation? Can we ever do more than be stewards of the earth, perhaps landscaping according to present use of land, always keeping in mind that "the earth is the Lord's, and all that therein is"?

Short Notes on Land, Humanity, and God by John G. Gibbs, PhD

Observations such as these may be useful in focusing our attention on Land in its relation to both us humans and God the Creator.

First: Concordances of biblical texts show the amount of attention that biblical literature gives to the land. John R. Kohlenberger, III's The New NRSV Concordance Unabridged (Zondervan, 1991) takes 7 pages to list the occurrences of "land," citing each chapter and verse, and providing for each occurrence a single line quoting how that word occurs in that location.

Robert Young, Analytical Concordance to the Holy Bible (London: Lutterworth, 1939 reprinted 1952) displays the KJV renditions of Hebrew and Greek words, thereby showing us the nuances of meaning. For instance, adamah is variously translated as "land, earth, ground, firm soil," and notice that adam (humanity) was not translated but only transliterated as "Adam." It is thus clear that the Genesis creation sagas emphasize the intimate bond between earth and the humanity that God raises up from the earth. Erets refers to "land, earth, country," and that word is the one used most frequently, 3 pages being required to list its occurrences. Sadeh is translated by KJV as "field, country, level place." The Greek words are agros (field), ge (earth), xeros (dry land), chora (place, region), and chorion (a small place, spot). "Land" can be as expansive as the whole earth or as small as a tract or a certain field. "Land" can be the dirt beneath our feet or a whole country.

Second: The World Business Council for Sustainable Development released on August 9, 2005 a report stating that "World Land Use Is Top Environmental Issue." The report is published in the July 22, 2005 issue of the journal Science. A climatologist at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Joanathan A. Foley, is the lead author of that report, and he concludes: "Land use has gone beyond being a local environmental issue. The global-scale impacts are greater than the sum of local events. Land use is having a transformative effect on the planet." Western-style agriculture, especially agribusiness, is unsustainable for the earth as a whole. Land use by humans may be "the most significant impact on the world's biosphere."

Third: Perspectives on land vary widely from one culture to another. Dramatically different assumptions about land, and human relationships to it, account for many misunderstandings between American Indians and early colonists. Who owns the land? "The earth is the Lord's and all that is in it, the world, and those who live in it" (Psalm 24:1). That being the case, what does it mean to have a contract for deed, or a deed that states ownership rights over a certain surveyed and legally described piece of land?

Could it be that American Indians were closer to the psalmist's point of view than were European immigrants who invaded North America? Donald W. Shriver, Jr., Honest Patriots: Loving a Country Enough to Remember Its Misdeeds (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 225-27, 240-41, 254-60 graphically portrays the poignant conflict between British jurisprudential and European capitalism's view of land during the colonial period and, on the other hand, American Indian relationships to land. He instances colonial mistreatment of the Mohicans of Columbia County, NY, a history that was "a cameo of what would become continent-wide exploitation" (226).

An Indian could sell something man-made such as a metal pot, and know that "the seller had no right of arbitrary repossession. But land was different. It was home. It was the place where the ancestors had lived from time immemorial and where they were buried. It was host to the wild animals that sustained human life through the winter. It could sustain a variable number of human lives, as migrants came and went, as one tract of land declined in its usefulness, as it underwent some years of natural restoration, after which it could be reinhabited. This complex of concepts combined with Indian belief in the spirit and ancestral presences in the land to render the European, especially English, idea of possession ('fee simple') as absurd" (225). It is not we who have the land, but the land that has us. "How unreasonable to think that a piece of paper a century old forever determined who could use a piece of land! It was a momentous collision of cultures" (226).

Fourth: Land does not stand alone. It implies community. Land is place for plants, animals, and humans, all living in holistic ecology. Human culture and social mores impact for ill or for good the land and all other creatures that depend on the land. Human destructiveness toward other human persons and cultures spills over into the environment. The "sufferings of this present time" include "the whole creation" that "has been groaning in labor pains" as it "waits with eager longing for the revealing of the children of God" (Romans 8:18-23).

Fifth: Land is of value in itself, for God created it and deemed it "good" (Genesis 1). Created as such, the earth by its very existence joins in the cosmic acclamation of the Creator. Psalm 96:7-13 calls on "the nations" and the material world together to praise the Lord who is "king." "Let the heavens be glad, and let the earth rejoice; let the sea roar, and all that fills it; let the field exult, and everything in it" (96:11-12). We humans are not alone in our worship of God. The lands beneath and around us are there with us in our praise to God.

Sixth: Richard Cartwright Austins 3rd volume in his Environmental Theology 4-volume series is titled Hope for the Land: Nature in the Bible (PO Box 331, Abingdon, VA 24210: Creekside Press, 1990). Dick Austin rightly maintains: Biblical ecology projects moral visions which embrace a future for nature as well as culture. The Lords promise of redemption extends to the whole created ecology. The biblical vision is not so much a perfect end as a new beginning, a jubilee. All species may be reconciled in Jesus, the Lamb of God, to achieve abundance and peace. Further: Through Sabbath reflection Hebrews discovered design in the relations between the Lord, humanity, and nature which became an inspired architecture for justice--a biblical ecology (87). Further: Since land was a part of the covenant community, it could not be treated as a commodity to be exchanged at ones convenience (91). The most difficult part of farming in Canaan was not the physical labor but obedience to God and moral sensitivity to intricate natural relationships (90). [see Deuteronomy 11:1-2, 10-15 New English Bible]

The Rev Deacon Helen Hanten, is deacon emeritus at and a member of St. Andrew's by-the-Lake Episcopal Church, Duluth, MN. She originally wrote these notes in 2005. John G. Gibbs, PhD, a retired theologian, attends Trinity Episcopal Church, Park Rapids, MN. He originally wrote these notes in 2005. Helen, John, and we welcome your comments. Please address your comments or additional reflections to Helen Hanten or John Gibbs or any MEESC member, or mail them to:

MEESC c/o C. Morello 4451 Lakeside Drive Eveleth, MN 55734-4400 USA

The MEESC assumes that all correspondence received is for publication on this web site. If your comments are not for publication, please so note on your correspondence. The MEESC reserves the right to decide which items are included on the web site.

This page last updated 06-02-23.

This page maintained for the MEESC by To the IRIS Enterprises Homepage.

Please send any corrections to the MEESC WebVerger or our Web Team